| Risiko / Label | Veröffentlichung | |
|---|---|---|
| Risiko ? / 10 OSV-2022-842 | vor 1 Stunde(n) | |
| OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=50946 ``` Crash type: Stack-buffer-overflow WRITE {*} Crash state: wc_Shake256_Final wc_ed448_sign_msg_ex wc_ed448_sign_msg ``` | ||
| Risiko ? / 10 OSV-2023-307 | vor 1 Stunde(n) | |
| OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=57911 ``` Crash type: Heap-buffer-overflow READ 1 Crash state: bit_read_BB dwg_decode_entity dwg_decode_OLE2FRAME_private ``` | ||
| Risiko ? / 10 OSV-2023-107 | vor 1 Stunde(n) | |
| OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=56308 ``` Crash type: Heap-buffer-overflow READ {*} Crash state: DecodeBasicOcspResponse OcspResponseDecode ocsp.c ``` | ||
| Risiko ? / 10 OSV-2022-714 | vor 1 Stunde(n) | |
| OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=50194 ``` Crash type: Heap-buffer-overflow WRITE 16 Crash state: dynapi_set_helper dwg_dynapi_header_set_value json_HEADER ``` | ||
| Risiko ? / 10 OSV-2022-653 | vor 1 Stunde(n) | |
| OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=49602 ``` Crash type: Heap-double-free Crash state: dwg_free_common_entity_data dwg_free_DIMENSION_ANG2LN dwg_free_object ``` | ||
| Risiko ? / 10 OSV-2022-372 | vor 1 Stunde(n) | |
| OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=46994 ``` Crash type: Heap-buffer-overflow READ 8 Crash state: dwg_encode_VERTEX_2D dwg_encode_add_object dwg_encode ``` | ||
| Risiko 5 / 10 CVE-2026-55568 | vor 1 Stunde(n) | |
| ### Impact The built-in cURL handlers (`GuzzleHttp\Handler\CurlHandler` and `GuzzleHttp\Handler\CurlMultiHandler`, used by default whenever the PHP cURL extension is available) accept an `https://` proxy — a proxy reached over a TLS-encrypted connection — through the `proxy` request option, client-level `proxy` defaults, or proxy environment variables such as `http_proxy`, `https_proxy`, `HTTPS_PROXY`, `all_proxy`, and `ALL_PROXY`. When the installed libcurl does not support HTTPS proxies, behavior depends on the libcurl version/build: - libcurl older than 7.50.2 silently treats an `https://` proxy as a plaintext `http://` proxy. The TLS connection to the proxy is never established, and the proxy leg is cleartext with no error or warning. - libcurl 7.50.2 through 7.51.x rejects the unsupported proxy scheme at connect time, so no cleartext exposure occurs, but the failure is late and opaque. - libcurl 7.52.0 or newer builds without HTTPS-proxy support also fail at connect time rather than downgrading. The security-relevant case is the silent downgrade on libcurl older than 7.50.2. An application is affected when it sends requests through one of the built-in cURL handlers, configures an `https://` proxy expecting the proxy connection itself to be encrypted, and runs with libcurl older than 7.50.2. In that configuration, traffic expected to be protected by TLS on the hop to the proxy is transmitted in cleartext. Proxy authentication credentials (the `Proxy-Authorization` header, proxy userinfo in the proxy URL, or `CURLOPT_PROXYUSERPWD`) are sent without encryption, and the `CONNECT` target host and port for tunneled HTTPS requests are exposed. For plain HTTP requests, request headers and bodies are also exposed on the proxy leg. End-to-end HTTPS requests tunneled through the proxy remain protected by their inner TLS session; the exposure is limited to the proxy negotiation and proxy credentials. Applications that do not configure an `https://` proxy are not affected. Installations running libcurl 7.52.0 or newer built with HTTPS-proxy support are not affected because HTTPS proxies work as intended. Installations running libcurl 7.50.2 through 7.51.x, or libcurl 7.52.0 or newer built without HTTPS-proxy support, are not exposed to the silent cleartext downgrade, but Guzzle now rejects those unsupported configurations up front as well. The built-in stream handler is not affected; the issue is specific to the cURL handlers' proxy handling. Low-level cURL options under the `curl` request option, such as `CURLOPT_PROXY` or `CURLOPT_PROXYTYPE`, are advanced custom configuration and remain the caller's responsibility. ### Patches The issue is patched in `7.12.1` and later. Starting in that release, the built-in cURL handlers detect whether the installed libcurl supports HTTPS proxies — requiring both libcurl 7.52.0 or newer and the `CURL_VERSION_HTTPS_PROXY` feature bit — and reject a request configured through Guzzle's first-class proxy handling with an `https://` proxy up front by throwing a `GuzzleHttp\Exception\RequestException`. No request bytes reach the network when the proxy cannot be used securely. Versions before `7.12.1` are affected by the silent downgrade when run against libcurl older than 7.50.2. ### Workarounds If you cannot upgrade immediately, do not configure an `https://` proxy on an installation whose libcurl lacks HTTPS-proxy support, and verify the capability in application code before using one. Remember to check proxy environment variables as well as any explicit `proxy` option: ```php $curl = \curl_version(); $httpsProxyBit = \defined('CURL_VERSION_HTTPS_PROXY') ? \CURL_VERSION_HTTPS_PROXY : (1 << 21); if (\version_compare($curl['version'], '7.52.0', '<') || 0 === ($curl['features'] & $httpsProxyBit)) { throw new \RuntimeException('Installed libcurl does not support HTTPS proxies.'); } ``` Upgrading the system libcurl to 7.52.0 or newer built with HTTPS-proxy support also resolves the underlying unsupported-proxy behavior. | ||
| Risiko ? / 10 OSV-2023-239 | vor 1 Stunde(n) | |
| OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=57401 ``` Crash type: Use-of-uninitialized-value Crash state: ihevce_strm_fill_done ihevce_ent_coding_thrd osal_func ``` | ||
| Risiko ? / 10 OSV-2023-235 | vor 1 Stunde(n) | |
| OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=57398 ``` Crash type: Use-of-uninitialized-value Crash state: complexity_RC_reset_marking ihevce_pre_enc_process_frame_thrd osal_func ``` | ||
| Risiko ? / 10 OSV-2023-234 | vor 1 Stunde(n) | |
| OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=57397 ``` Crash type: Use-of-uninitialized-value Crash state: ihevce_enc_frm_proc_slave_thrd osal_func posix_memalign ``` | ||
| Risiko ? / 10 OSV-2022-1259 | vor 1 Stunde(n) | |
| OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=54228 ``` Crash type: Heap-buffer-overflow READ 1 Crash state: dwg_decode_INSERT_private dwg_decode_INSERT dwg_decode_add_object ``` | ||
| Risiko 5 / 10 CVE-2026-55414 | vor 1 Stunde(n) | |
| ## Summary
The public GraphQL resolvers `getFormDefinitionByObjectenApiUrl(url)` and the deprecated `getFormDefinitionById(id)` fetch a caller-supplied URL using the **privileged Objecten-API token**. Because the `/graphql` endpoint is `permitAll()` and these resolvers do not declare a `CommonGroundAuthentication` parameter, an **unauthenticated** caller can make the backend issue an outbound request carrying `Authorization: Token |
||
| Risiko 5 / 10 CVE-2026-55375 | vor 1 Stunde(n) | |
| ## Summary
In affected versions, the OAuth2 token request sends `app_id`, `app_secret`,
`refresh_token` and `code` as URL query parameters of the POST request to
`https://oauth. |
||
| Risiko ? / 10 OSV-2022-400 | vor 1 Stunde(n) | |
| OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=47300 ``` Crash type: Heap-double-free Crash state: dwg_free_XRECORD_private dwg_free_XRECORD dwg_free_object ``` | ||
| Risiko ? / 10 OSV-2022-1198 | vor 1 Stunde(n) | |
| OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=53617 ``` Crash type: Heap-buffer-overflow READ 8 Crash state: dwg_json_LTYPE json_objects_write dwg_write_json ``` | ||
| Risiko ? / 10 OSV-2022-1176 | vor 1 Stunde(n) | |
| OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=53483 ``` Crash type: Heap-double-free Crash state: dwg_free llvmfuzz.c dwg_free ``` | ||
| Risiko ? / 10 OSV-2021-1343 | vor 1 Stunde(n) | |
| OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=38994 ``` Crash type: Heap-buffer-overflow READ 8 Crash state: get_next_owned_entity dwg_write_dxfb llvmfuzz.c ``` | ||
| Risiko ? / 10 OSV-2021-1086 | vor 1 Stunde(n) | |
| OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=36728 ``` Crash type: Heap-buffer-overflow READ 2 Crash state: dwg_convert_SAB_to_SAT1 dxf_3dsolid dwg_dxf_REGION_private ``` | ||
| Risiko ? / 10 OSV-2022-388 | vor 1 Stunde(n) | |
| OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=47151 ``` Crash type: Segv on unknown address Crash state: dwg_ref_get_object dwg_geojson_feature dwg_geojson_object ``` | ||
| Risiko ? / 10 OSV-2022-379 | vor 1 Stunde(n) | |
| OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=47014 ``` Crash type: Segv on unknown address Crash state: bit_write_TV bit_write_T dwg_encode_BLOCK ``` | ||
| Risiko 5 / 10 CVE-2026-55374 | vor 1 Stunde(n) | |
| ## Summary In affected versions, `Request::buildRequestUrl()` inserts path variables into the request URL without URL encoding (`implode('/', $pathVariables)`). All request classes implementing `getPathVariables()` are affected, e.g. `GetContentDetailsRequest` (`scheme`, `contentId`). If a consuming application passes untrusted input (such as an ID taken from an HTTP request parameter) as a path variable, characters like `../`, `?` or `#` are sent verbatim and can change the path of the resulting API request. ## Impact An attacker who controls a path variable value can redirect the library's authenticated request — the Bearer access token is attached in `AbstractEndpoint::sendRequest()` — to a different API endpoint of the same Canto instance, causing unintended reads or writes with the privileges of the configured app. The impact depends on how the consuming application sources path variable values; applications that only pass trusted, validated IDs are not exploitable. ## Patches Fixed in 3.0.0: every path segment is encoded with `rawurlencode()` before being inserted into the request URL. ## Workarounds If you cannot upgrade, validate untrusted values before passing them to request classes, e.g. enforce an allowlist pattern such as `^[A-Za-z0-9_-]+$` for content IDs and schemes. | ||
| Risiko 5 / 10 CVE-2026-9679 | vor 1 Tag(en) | |
| ## Impact undici's cookie parser in `parseSetCookie` percent-decodes cookie values via `qsUnescape`, turning encoded sequences like `%0D%0A`, `%00`, `%3B`, and `%3D` into their literal byte equivalents. RFC 6265 §5.4 does not specify any decoding and browsers do not decode either. Applications that parse a `Set-Cookie` header and then forward the parsed value into a response header (proxies, middleware, SSR frameworks) become vulnerable to HTTP response header injection: an attacker-controlled upstream can inject arbitrary `Set-Cookie`, `Location`, or `Cache-Control` headers into the application's downstream response, enabling session fixation, open redirect, or cache poisoning. Affected applications are those that use undici's cookie parsing (`parseSetCookie`, `parseCookie`, `getSetCookies`) and forward the parsed cookie value into a response header. This was introduced in undici 7.0.0 via [#3789](https://github.com/nodejs/undici/pull/3789). ## Patches Upgrade to undici v6.27.0, v7.28.0 or v8.5.0. ## Workarounds If upgrade is not immediately possible, do not forward values returned by `parseSetCookie`/`parseCookie`/`getSetCookies` directly into response headers; sanitize the value first to strip or reject CR, LF, NUL, `;`, and `=` bytes. | ||
| Risiko 7.5 / 10 CVE-2026-6734 | vor 1 Tag(en) | |
| ## Impact When using `Socks5ProxyAgent`, undici reuses a single connection pool across different origins without verifying that the pool's origin matches the requested origin. All requests are dispatched through the pool connected to the first origin, regardless of the intended destination. This causes cross-origin request routing: credentials and request data intended for origin B are sent to origin A, responses from the wrong origin are trusted, and HTTPS requests may be silently downgraded to HTTP. Impacted users are applications that use `Socks5ProxyAgent` (directly or via `setGlobalDispatcher`) and make requests to more than one origin. This was introduced in undici 7.23.0 via [#4385](https://github.com/nodejs/undici/pull/4385) and affects all versions through 8.1.0. ## Patches Upgrade to undici v7.28.0 or v8.2.0 ## Workarounds Use a separate `Socks5ProxyAgent` instance per origin, or avoid using `Socks5ProxyAgent` with multiple origins. | ||
| Risiko 2 / 10 CVE-2026-6733 | vor 1 Tag(en) | |
| ## Impact Undici's HTTP/1.1 client is vulnerable to response queue poisoning on reused keep-alive sockets. An attacker-controlled upstream server can inject an unsolicited HTTP/1.1 response onto an idle socket after a request completes. When the client dispatches the next request on that socket, it associates the injected response with the new request, causing responses to be delivered to the wrong requests. This requires an attacker-controlled or compromised upstream HTTP/1.1 server and keep-alive connection reuse. ## Patches Upgrade to undici v6.27.0, v7.28.0 or v8.5.0. ## Workarounds Disable keep-alive connection reuse by setting `keepAliveTimeout: 0` on the Client or Pool. | ||
| Risiko 7.5 / 10 CVE-2026-12151 | vor 1 Tag(en) | |
| ## Impact The undici WebSocket client enforces `maxPayloadSize` on the cumulative byte count of fragments in a message but does not enforce a limit on the number of fragments. A malicious WebSocket server can stream many small or empty continuation frames that each pass per-frame and cumulative-size validation, collectively causing unbounded memory growth in the client process. The result is memory exhaustion and a denial of service. Affected applications are those using the undici WebSocket client (`new WebSocket(...)`) or the `WebSocketStream` API that can be induced to connect to an attacker-controlled or compromised WebSocket endpoint. All releases starting at undici 6.17.0 are affected. ## Patches Upgrade to undici v6.27.0, v7.28.0 or v8.5.0. ## Workarounds No workaround is available. The fix must be applied through an upgrade. | ||
| 18.06.2026 - Operation Endgame 4.0 | 153.527 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Email addresses, Passwords On 18 June 2026, the latest phase of Operation Endgame targeted the SocGholish malware operation, a prolific malware distribution network used to compromise systems and facilitate further cybercrime. Coordinated by international law enforcement agencies with support from Europol and Eurojust, the operation remediated almost 15,000 compromised websites and disrupted more than 100 servers and domains used to distribute malware. Authorities also provided HIBP with 154k impacted email addresses and more than half a million previously unseen passwords. |
||
| 15.06.2026 - June 2026 Stealer Logs | 56.278.397 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Email addresses, Passwords In June 2026, a collection of accumulated stealer logs from various sources was added to HIBP. The corpus comprised 56M unique email addresses across hundreds of millions of stealer log records. The data also contained 124M unique passwords, which have been added to Pwned Passwords and are now searchable. Individuals can view any records captured against their email address in the stealer logs section of their dashboard. Organisations can see logs affecting their domain via the stealer logs API. |
||
| 11.06.2026 - Ralph Lauren | 139.903 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Age groups, Email addresses, Genders, Names, Phone numbers In June 2026, fashion retailer Ralph Lauren was targeted in a ShinyHunters "pay or leak" extortion campaign. The group subsequently published hundreds of gigabytes of data they claimed was obtained from the organisation's Salesforce instance, including 140k unique email addresses along with names, phone numbers, genders and age groups. |
||
| 09.06.2026 - University of Nottingham | 454.635 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Academic records, Citizenship statuses, Dates of birth, Disabilities, Email addresses, Ethnicities, Genders, IP addresses, Names, Passport numbers, Phone numbers, Physical addresses, Purchases, Salutations, Usernames In June 2026, the University of Nottingham was the target of a cyber attack, later linked to a ShinyHunters "pay or leak" extortion campaign. Tens of gigabytes of data were subsequently published online and included 455k unique email addresses along with extensive personal information including names, addresses, phone numbers, ethnicities, disabilities, passport numbers and information relating to academic enrolments and fee payments. In a post about the incident, the university advised that the breach affected both "current students, and alumni". |
||
| 30.05.2026 - Atlas Menu | 63.926 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Email addresses, IP addresses, Passwords, Support tickets, Usernames In May 2026, the GTA V and CS2 cheat service Atlas Menu suffered a data breach. An attacker claimed to have gained access to all Atlas systems and published the service's database to a public GitHub repository. The incident exposed 64k unique email addresses along with usernames, IP addresses, support tickets and passwords stored as bcrypt hashes. |
||
| 29.05.2026 - BCD Travel | 396.313 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Email addresses, Employers, Job titles, Names, Phone numbers, Physical addresses, Support tickets In May 2026, the corporate travel management company BCD Travel was claimed as a victim of the ShinyHunters "pay or leak" extortion campaign. Data allegedly obtained from BCD was subsequently published publicly in early June and contained 396k unique email addresses. Other exposed data included names, addresses, phone numbers, job titles and employer names, spanning a variety of different data sets including leads, internal staff and support tickets. |
||
| 23.05.2026 - Baker Distributing | 102.935 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Email addresses, Names, Phone numbers, Physical addresses, Support tickets In May 2026, the HVAC/R wholesale distributor Baker Distributing Company was added to the ShinyHunters data extortion group's "pay or leak" site. In early June, the group publicly published data they claimed had been obtained from Baker's SharePoint and Salesforce infrastructure including 103k unique email addresses along with names, physical addresses, phone numbers and tickets relating to the company's HVAC contractor customer base. The exposed data was largely corporate contact and support information with limited sensitivity. |
||
| 23.05.2026 - Charter | 4.851.517 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Email addresses, Job titles, Names, Phone numbers, Physical addresses In May 2026, the telecommunications company Charter Communications (the parent company behind the consumer broadband and cable brand Spectrum) was named by the ShinyHunters group in a "pay or leak" extortion campaign. The group later published the data, which exposed 4.9M unique email addresses along with names, phone numbers and physical addresses. A subset of approximately 85k records originating from an internal employee directory also included job titles. Charter confirmed the incident, but stated that no sensitive personal information or customer proprietary network information (CPNI) was exfiltrated. |
||
| 23.05.2026 - DentaQuest | 2.553.599 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Dates of birth, Email addresses, Genders, Government issued IDs, Health insurance information, Names, Phone numbers, Physical addresses In May 2026, the dental benefits administrator DentaQuest was the target of a ShinyHunters "pay or leak" extortion campaign that resulted in the group publicly publishing hundreds of gigabytes of data allegedly obtained from the company. The data included 2.6M unique email addresses along with names, addresses and phone numbers. Much of the data appeared in healthcare enrollment files (ASC X12 transaction sets) with some containing Medicaid IDs, while additional data appeared in member records and related files. DentaQuest acknowledged "a cybersecurity incident involving unauthorized access to a limited portion of our network", and advised they had contained the attack and mitigated the threat. |
||
| 05.05.2026 - Cushman & Wakefield | 310.431 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Email addresses, Job titles, Names, Phone numbers, Physical addresses, Salutations In May 2026, the real estate services firm Cushman & Wakefield was the target of a "pay or leak" extortion campaign by the ShinyHunters group. Following the threat, the group publicly published data they alleged had been obtained from the firm, consisting mostly of C&W email addresses along with tens of thousands of external email addresses and corporate contact records. The exposed data was primarily business information, including names, job titles, company addresses and phone numbers. |
||
| 30.04.2026 - Reborn Gaming | 126 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Email addresses, IP addresses In April 2026, the gaming community Reborn Gaming suffered a data breach due to a vulnerability in cPanel and WebHost Manager (WHM). The breach exposed 126 unique email addresses along with IP addresses and Steam IDs. Reborn Gaming self-submitted the data to Have I Been Pwned. |
||
| 28.04.2026 - Vimeo | 119.167 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Email addresses, Names In April 2026, the ShinyHunters extortion group listed Vimeo on their extortion portal as part of their "pay or leak" campaign. They subsequently published hundreds of gigabytes of data, predominantly consisting of video titles, technical data and metadata. The data also included 119k unique email addresses, sometimes accompanied by names. Vimeo attributed the exposure to a breach of Anodot, a third-party analytics vendor, and advised the incident does not include "Vimeo video content, valid user login credentials, or payment card information". |
||
| 26.04.2026 - CTT | 468.124 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Email addresses, Names, Phone numbers In April 2026, data allegedly obtained from CTT, Portugal's national postal service, was posted to a public hacking forum. The data included 468k unique email addresses along with names, phone numbers and parcel tracking numbers which can be used to retrieve the tracking history of the parcel. |
||
| 24.04.2026 - Udemy | 1.401.259 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Email addresses, Employers, Job titles, Names, Payment methods, Phone numbers, Physical addresses In April 2026, online training company Udemy was the victim of a “pay or leak” extortion attempt perpetrated by the ShinyHunters group. The data was subsequently leaked publicly and contained 1.4M unique email addresses belonging to customers and instructors. The data also included names, physical addresses, phone numbers, employer information and instructor payout methods including PayPal, cheque and bank transfer. |
||
| 20.04.2026 - ADT | 5.488.888 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Dates of birth, Email addresses, Names, Partial government issued IDs, Phone numbers, Physical addresses In April 2026, home security firm ADT confirmed a data breach by ShinyHunters, which listed the company on its website as part of a "pay or leak" extortion attempt. The breach impacted 5.5M unique email addresses along with names, phone numbers and physical addresses. ADT also advised that "in a small percentage of cases, dates of birth and the last four digits of Social Security numbers or Tax IDs were included" and that it had contacted all affected people. |
||
| 20.04.2026 - Aman | 215.563 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Dates of birth, Email addresses, Genders, Language preferences, Names, Nationalities, Phone numbers, Physical addresses, Spouses names, VIP statuses In April 2026, the ultra-luxury hotel brand Aman was named by ShinyHunters as the target of a "pay or leak" extortion campaign, with the data allegedly obtained from their Salesforce CRM. The data was subsequently leaked publicly and contained over 200k unique email addresses. Whilst not present on all records, the data also included genders, physical addresses, phone numbers, nationalities, dates of birth, spouse names and VIP status codes. |
||
| 20.04.2026 - Canada Life | 237.810 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Email addresses, Job titles, Names, Phone numbers, Physical addresses, Salutations, Support tickets In April 2026, Canada Life was the victim of a "pay or leak" extortion campaign by the ShinyHunters group. The group subsequently published the data which contained over 200k unique email addresses along with names, phone numbers, physical addresses and, in some cases, customer support tickets. In their disclosure notice, Canada Life advised that "it is a small proportion of our customers who may have been impacted". In the wake of the incident, Canada Life also published an alert cautioning customers to be wary of phishing attacks, a pattern often seen after the public release of breached data. |
||
| 20.04.2026 - Pitney Bowes | 8.243.989 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Email addresses, Job titles, Names, Phone numbers, Physical addresses In April 2026, the hacking collective ShinyHunters claimed to have obtained data from Pitney Bowes as part of a broader extortion campaign that also named several other organisations. After negotiations allegedly failed, the group publicly released the data which included 8.2M unique email addresses, along with names, phone numbers and physical addresses. A subset of the data also included Pitney Bowes employee records with job titles. |
||
| 18.04.2026 - Carnival | 7.531.359 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Dates of birth, Email addresses, Genders, Geographic locations, Loyalty program details, Names, Salutations In April 2026, the notorious hacking collective ShinyHunters claimed they had obtained a substantial volume of data belonging to the Carnival cruise operator and attempted to extort the organisation to prevent the data from being leaked. The following week, the group published the data publicly, which contained 8.7M records with 7.5M unique email addresses. The data contained fields indicating it related to the Mariner Society loyalty program run by Holland America, a cruise line brand under Carnival, and included names, dates of birth, genders and data relating to status within the loyalty program. Carnival acknowledged a phishing incident involving a single user account and advised they were working to better understand the scope of the unauthorised activity. |
||
| 15.04.2026 - Kemper | 269.299 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Email addresses, Names, Partial credit card data, Phone numbers, Physical addresses, Purchases In April 2026, the American insurance holding company Kemper Corporation was named by the ShinyHunters ransomware group in a "pay or leak" extortion campaign. The attackers allegedly accessed Kemper's Salesforce environment via social engineering as part of a broader campaign targeting hundreds of organisations using the same method. The group later published tens of gigabytes of data they claimed included internal directory data, Salesforce records and Stripe payment logs. Among the 269k unique email addresses were names, phone numbers, physical addresses and partial payment card data including the last 4 digits, expiry dates and card brands. Kemper confirmed the incident and stated they had engaged third-party cybersecurity experts and notified law enforcement. |
||
| 15.04.2026 - Zara | 197.376 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Email addresses, Geographic locations, Purchases, Support tickets In April 2026, the fashion brand Zara was among a number of organisations targeted by the ShinyHunters extortion group as part of their "pay or leak" campaign. The group claimed the breach was related to a compromise of the Anodot analytics platform and subsequently published a terabyte of data allegedly including 95M support ticket records. The data contained 197k unique email addresses alongside product SKUs, order IDs and the market the support ticket originated in. Zara's parent company Inditex advised that the incident didn't affect passwords or payment information. |
||
| 14.04.2026 - Abrigo | 711.099 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Email addresses, Employers, Job titles, Names, Phone numbers, Physical addresses In April 2026, the fintech software company Abrigo was targeted in a "pay or leak" extortion attempt by the ShinyHunters group. Shortly after, data allegedly taken from the company's Salesforce instance was published publicly and contained over 700k unique email addresses belonging to both Abrigo staff and external contacts. Whilst separate from Abrigo's Salesforce compromise via the Drift application connector the previous year, the data fields described in that incident are consistent with the ShinyHunters data, namely that it was "business contact information" including "institution name, employee name, email addresses, and phone numbers". |
||
| 12.04.2026 - Marcus & Millichap | 1.837.078 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Email addresses, Employers, Job titles, Names, Phone numbers, Physical addresses In April 2026, the commercial real estate brokerage firm Marcus & Millichap was named as one of multiple alleged victims of the ShinyHunters hacking and extortion group. Data alleged to have been obtained from the company was subsequently released publicly and included 1.8M unique email addresses, along with names, phone numbers and employment-related information including employer, job title and physical company address. In their disclosure notice, Marcus & Millichap advised that data which may have been accessed appeared limited to "company forms, templates, marketing materials, and general contact information". |
||
| 12.04.2026 - Mytheresa | 84.108 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Email addresses, Names, Partial credit card data, Phone numbers, Physical addresses, Purchases, Salutations In April 2026, the luxury fashion e-commerce platform Mytheresa was listed as a victim of the ShinyHunters "pay or leak" extortion group. After the ransom deadline passed, the group publicly released the data which contained 84k unique email addresses. The exposed data also included names, phone numbers, physical addresses, purchases and partial credit card data including card type, last 4 digits and expiry date. |
||
| 10.04.2026 - McGraw Hill | 13.500.136 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Email addresses, Names, Phone numbers, Physical addresses In April 2026, education company McGraw Hill confirmed a data breach following an extortion attempt. Attributed to a Salesforce misconfiguration, the company stated the incident exposed "a limited set of data from a webpage hosted by Salesforce on its platform". More than 100GB of data was later publicly distributed, containing 13.5M unique email addresses across multiple files, with additional fields such as name, physical address and phone number appearing inconsistently across some records. |
||
| 08.04.2026 - 7-Eleven | 185.256 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Dates of birth, Email addresses, Names, Phone numbers, Physical addresses In April 2026, 7-Eleven was the victim of a "pay or leak" extortion campaign by ShinyHunters, with the data later published that month. The incident exposed 185k unique email addresses, along with names, physical addresses, dates of birth and phone numbers. A small number of records also contained additional exposed data fields. The company later advised the breach was limited to "certain 7-Eleven systems used to store franchisee documents", a statement consistent with the exposed data. |
||
| 07.04.2026 - My Lovely AI | 106.271 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Email addresses, Social media profiles In April 2026, the NSFW AI girlfriend platform My Lovely AI suffered a data breach that exposed over 100k users. The data included user-created prompts and links to the resulting AI-generated images, along with a small number of Discord and X usernames. |
||
| 06.04.2026 - LegionProxy | 10.144 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Email addresses, Names, Passwords, Purchases In April 2026, the commercial residential and ISP proxy network LegionProxy suffered a data breach. The incident exposed 10k email addresses, bcrypt password hashes, names and purchases. |
||
| 03.04.2026 - Amtrak | 2.147.679 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Email addresses, Names, Physical addresses, Support tickets In April 2026, the hacking group ShinyHunters claimed they had breached Amtrak. The group typically compromises organisations' Salesforce instances before demanding a ransom and later, if not paid, dumping the data publicly. They subsequently published the alleged data which contained over 2M unique email addresses along with names, physical addresses and customer support records. |
||
| 02.04.2026 - SongTrivia2 | 291.739 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Auth tokens, Avatars, Email addresses, Names, Passwords, Usernames In April 2026, the music trivia platform SongTrivia2 suffered a data breach that was subsequently published to a public hacking forum. The data contained a total of 291k unique email addresses sourced from either Google OAuth logins or accounts created on the site, the latter also containing bcrypt password hashes. The data also included names, usernames and avatars. |
||
| 31.03.2026 - Hallmark | 1.736.520 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Email addresses, Names, Phone numbers, Physical addresses, Support tickets In March 2026, Hallmark suffered an alleged breach and subsequent extortion after attackers gained access to data stored within Salesforce. The data was later published after the extortion deadline passed, exposing 1.7M unique email addresses across both Hallmark and the Hallmark+ streaming service, along with names, phone numbers, physical addresses and support tickets. |
||
| 27.03.2026 - ZenBusiness | 5.118.184 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Email addresses, Names, Phone numbers In March 2026, the hacker and extortion group "ShinyHunters" claimed to have obtained a substantial corpus of data from ZenBusiness, a business formation and compliance platform. The group claimed the data had been exfiltrated from platforms including Snowflake, Mixpanel and Salesforce, and threatened to publish it if a ransom was not paid. The following month, after claiming payment had not been made, ShinyHunters publicly released the data. The collection amounted to many terabytes across thousands of files that appeared to originate from multiple systems and business functions, including leads, support records and other CRM-related data. The data contained approximately 5M unique email addresses, often accompanied by name and phone number depending on the source file. |
||
| 26.03.2026 - BreachForums Version 5 | 339.778 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Email addresses, Passwords, Usernames In March 2026, a breach of one of the many iterations of the BreachForums hacking forum known as "Version 5" was publicly disclosed. The incident exposed 340k unique email addresses along with usernames and argon2 password hashes. |
||
| 25.03.2026 - Addi | 34.532.941 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Age groups, Credit scores, Device information, Email addresses, Government issued IDs, Income levels, IP addresses, Latitude and longitude pairs, Names, Phone numbers, Physical addresses, Purchases, Socioeconomic levels In March 2026, the Colombian fintech company Addi identified unauthorised activity on its platform and advised customers that "it is possible that your personal information may have been compromised". The "pay or leak" extortion group ShinyHunters subsequently claimed responsibility and published a large trove of personal data allegedly obtained from Addi. The data included 34M unique email addresses from credit scoring requests, credit bureau records, customer identity records and email validation logs. It also contained government issued IDs (Cédula de Ciudadanía), estimated income, socioeconomic levels, purchases and other credit-related data points. |
||
| 25.03.2026 - Sound Radix | 292.993 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Email addresses, Names, Passwords In March 2026, the audio production tools company Sound Radix disclosed a data breach that they subsequently self-submitted to HIBP. The incident impacted 293k unique email addresses and names. Sound Radix advised that it is possible that additional data including hashed passwords may have been exposed, and that no financial or credit card information was impacted. |
||
| 19.03.2026 - Berkadia | 305.216 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Email addresses, Employers, Names, Phone numbers, Physical addresses In March 2026, the commercial real estate finance company Berkadia was the target of a ShinyHunters "pay or leak" extortion campaign. The group subsequently published data they alleged was taken from Berkadia's Salesforce instance, including over 300k unique email addresses as well as names, physical addresses and phone numbers, among other data. |
||
| 18.03.2026 - Infinite Campus | 137.123 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Email addresses, Employers, Job titles, Names, Phone numbers, Physical addresses, Support tickets, Usernames In March 2026, the student information system Infinite Campus was targeted in a ShinyHunters "pay or leak" extortion campaign. The group subsequently published data they alleged was taken from Infinite Campus, containing 137k unique email addresses along with names, phone numbers, physical addresses and support tickets. Infinite Campus subsequently sent notifications, advising that the exposed data largely consisted of "names and contact information for school staff" and that "the majority is directory information commonly found on school websites". |
||
| 13.03.2026 - Divine Skins | 105.814 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Email addresses, Purchases, Usernames In March 2026, the League of Legends custom skins service Divine Skins suffered a data breach. The incident was disclosed via the service's Discord server, where Divine Skins stated that an unauthorised third party accessed part of its systems, deleted all skins from the database and exposed email addresses and usernames. The data also contained a history of purchases made by users. |
||
| 12.03.2026 - Crunchyroll | 1.195.684 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Email addresses In March 2026, the anime streaming service Crunchyroll suffered a data breach alleged to have impacted 6.8M users. The exposed data is reported to have originated from the company's Zendesk support system where "name, login name, email address, IP address, general geographic location and the contents of the support tickets" were exposed. A subset of 1.2M email addresses from an alleged 2M record dataset being sold was later provided to HIBP. |
||
| 08.03.2026 - Baydöner | 1.266.822 Datensätze geleaked | |
| Dates of birth, Email addresses, Genders, Geographic locations, Government issued IDs, Names, Passwords, Phone numbers, Purchases In March 2026, the Turkish restaurant chain Baydöner suffered a data breach which was subsequently published to a public hacking forum. The incident exposed over 1.2M unique email addresses along with names, phone numbers, cities of residence and plaintext passwords. A small number of records also included Turkish national ID number and date of birth. In their disclosure notice, Baydöner stated that payment and financial data was not affected. |
||